Blog
/
RFP vs. RFI: Where the difference lies?

RFP vs. RFI: Where the difference lies?

RFP or RFI? Learn the key differences and why treating them the same can cost you. A simple, clear comparison for smarter public sector responses.
5
min read

In public procurement, it’s easy to get lost in terminology. Two of the most common (and most misunderstood) are RFP (Request for Proposal) and RFI (Request for Information). At first glance, they seem similar. Both come from public buyers. Both ask suppliers to respond. But their purpose, timing, and impact are completely different.

We’ve already written two separate articles to explain each in depth:

But many companies still ask the same question:

What’s the difference between them and how should we respond?

That’s why we’ve created this comparison-focused article. You won’t find definitions here. Instead, you’ll find a clear, side-by-side view of how RFIs and RFPs really differ, and why getting them right matters to your business development strategy.

If you’re tired of guessing or treating every tender the same, this is the clarity you’ve been looking for.

Let’s start with why this distinction is more important than it might seem.

Why does the difference between RFP and RFI matter more than you think?

For many businesses, especially those new to public procurement, RFPs and RFIs seem like two versions of the same thing. Both ask you to respond. Both involve government buyers. Both appear official and time-sensitive.

But treating them the same is a strategic mistake.

  • An RFI is not a competition, it’s a conversation.
  • An RFP is not a discussion, it’s a formal decision-making process.

If you respond to an RFI like it’s an RFP, with a full proposal, pricing, and contract terms, you might overwhelm the buyer or miss the chance to influence the scope.

If you respond to an RFP like it’s an RFI, with a generic overview or surface-level answers, you risk being disqualified or scored poorly.

The timing, tone, and goal of your response should match the buyer’s intention.

When you get that right, you save time, increase credibility, and improve your win rate.

To see these differences more clearly, let’s look at how RFIs and RFPs compare — side by side.

RFP vs. RFI - the essentials, side by side

To respond effectively, you first need to understand how RFPs and RFIs differ at the core. Here’s a clear comparison of the two formats — stripped of jargon and focused on what really matters.

FeatureRFI (Request for information)RFP (Request for proposal)
Purpose Buyer explores the market Buyer chooses a supplier
Stage Early, before requirements are fixed Later, scope and budget already defined
Legal weight Non-binding Binding, leads to contracts
Buyer’s mindset Curious, learning, open to ideas Decisive, comparing, ready to buy
What they want Insights, feedback, capabilities Clear offer, solution, and price
Expected outcome No direct result Contract awarded to best proposal
Your role Advisor, help shape the tender Bidder, compete to win the project
Common mistake Ignoring or overselling Rushing or underpreparing

Understanding these differences is the first step. But applying them is what sets smart companies apart.

Next, let’s look at what happens when you treat these two documents the same — and why that’s a risk worth avoiding. Ready?

What happens when you treat RFI and RFP the same?

Many companies, even experienced ones, fall into the trap of responding to RFIs and RFPs the same way. It’s understandable. The documents can look similar. The deadlines often feel urgent. But responding without recognizing the difference can cost you more than you think.

Here’s what typically goes wrong:

  • You ignore the RFI and lose early influence
    • Some companies skip RFIs because “there’s no contract yet.”
    • But RFIs are where you can shape the future tender.
    • If you’re not visible early, you’re not considered later.
  • You oversell during an RFI and confuse the buyer
    • Submitting a full proposal in response to an RFI can feel out of place.
    • The buyer isn’t ready to compare offers. They’re looking for guidance.
    • Overselling too soon might push you out of the conversation.
  • You underprepare for an RFP and score poorly
    • If you treat an RFP like a light inquiry, your response will lack the detail needed to win.
    • Missing structure, pricing, or compliance details leads to disqualification.
    • You get one shot and buyers expect precision.

The takeaway? Clarity leads to confidence. And confidence leads to better responses, better positioning, and better results.

Let’s wrap up with a quick conclusion and how Tendify supports companies that want to take public sector opportunities seriously.

Conclusion: Clear understanding leads to better outcomes

RFPs and RFIs are not interchangeable. One is about helping the buyer explore the market. The other is about convincing them to choose you. Knowing the difference isn’t just helpful, it’s essential for responding the right way and protecting your team’s time and focus.

At Tendify, we help businesses across Europe discover public sector opportunities that actually match their goals and manage them with clarity from start to finish. Whether you’re looking to grow through tenders, expand across borders, or simply stay ahead of your competition, Tendify gives you the system to stay organized, informed, and in control.

We believe that public procurement should be accessible, not overwhelming. And it starts with understanding what’s in front of you, including the difference between an RFI and an RFP.

Ready to stop guessing and start working smarter?
Join Tendify’s early access and discover a better way to win public contracts — without wasting time on the wrong opportunities.
Join waitlist
Tendify logo
Wygrywaj zamówienia publiczne bez wysiłku dzięki isztucznej inteligencji
© 2025 - Tendify. All rights reserved.
Polityka prywatności