Blog
/
When to say no: How top suppliers choose which tenders not to chase?

When to say no: How top suppliers choose which tenders not to chase?

Stop wasting time on tenders that go nowhere. Learn how top suppliers qualify opportunities fast — and why saying no is a winning strategy.
5
min read

Here’s how it usually goes:

You find a tender that kind of fits. It’s not perfect, but maybe. You send it to your team. Someone starts drafting. Someone else scrambles to collect documents. Two days of work later, you submit… and hear nothing.

This cycle plays out every week in SME bid teams across Europe.

The problem? It’s not the bid. It’s the decision to bid at all.

The best suppliers (the ones who consistently win public contracts) don’t bid more. They qualify harder. They say no early, and they say it often.

This article isn’t about how to win tenders. It’s about how to spot the ones you should walk away from, before you sink time, energy, and credibility into a dead end.

Let’s start with why saying no isn’t a missed opportunity, it’s a competitive advantage.

Why saying no is a competitive advantage?

Bidding on every tender you find might feel productive, but in reality, it’s one of the fastest ways to burn out your team and drain your resources.

Here’s what actually happens when you chase too many tenders:

  • Your team gets stretched across low-probability bids
  • You cut corners to meet deadlines
  • You lose repeatedly, with no clear feedback
  • Morale drops, and everyone starts questioning the point

Meanwhile, the best suppliers? They’re bidding less, but winning more.

They treat public procurement like a pipeline. Not every opportunity goes into it. They qualify tenders the way smart sales teams qualify leads. If it’s not a fit, they walk away, quickly.

Saying no protects your time, your focus, and your win rate.

It’s not risk aversion… it’s strategy.

Next: let’s look at the red flags that signal a tender isn’t worth chasing.

Red flags that signal it’s time to pass

Not all tenders are created equal. Some are simply bad fits. Others are structured in ways that heavily favour an incumbent or leave too much uncertainty.

Here are the red flags that experienced suppliers walk away from, without second guessing:

Vague or recycled tender descriptions

If the scope feels copy-pasted, unclear, or contradicts itself, you’re likely heading into a mess. Unclear tenders usually lead to unfair evaluations.

No clear evaluation criteria

If the scoring isn’t outlined, or it’s just “best value,” that’s a problem. You need to know how you’ll be judged — or you’re bidding blind.

Unrealistic timelines or budgets

If the buyer wants too much, too fast, for too little — it’s a trap. Even if you win, you might lose on delivery.

You’re missing key requirements

Turnover thresholds, certifications, past experience, or local presence — if you don’t tick every box, don’t force it.

Buyer has a history of awarding to the same supplier

If past tenders show the same name over and over, that’s a clue. Not always a dealbreaker — but worth noting.

It distracts from better-fit tenders

This one’s easy to miss. If chasing this bid means dropping a stronger opportunity, it’s probably not worth it.

Now that you know the red flags — let’s talk about how great suppliers make the right call faster.

How top suppliers qualify tenders (in 10 minutes or less)?

Great bid teams don’t wait until halfway through writing to decide if a tender is worth it. They qualify fast, sometimes in under 10 minutes, using a simple internal checklist.

Here’s how they do it:

  1. Check for fit
    • Do we meet all eligibility requirements?
    • Is this in our core service area, region, and sector?
    • Is the value and scope realistic for our team?
  2. Scan the evaluation criteria
    • Are we competitive on price and the scoring areas?
    • Do we have strong, recent case studies to match this scope?
  3. Evaluate the buyer
    • Do they publish clear tenders and give feedback?
    • Is there a known incumbent we’re competing against?
  4. Gut check the effort vs return
    • Do we have the bandwidth right now?
    • What are we giving up to bid on this?

If it’s not a clear yes, it’s a no.

Next, let’s look at how tools like Tendify make this decision even easier (and way less manual).

How Tendify makes saying no easier (and smarter)

Knowing when to pass on a tender is a skill, but it’s also a bandwidth issue. When you’re manually reviewing dozens of tenders a week, it’s hard to qualify them quickly or objectively.

That’s where Tendify helps.

Instead of scrolling through portals and guessing which tenders are a fit, Tendify:

  • Matches tenders to your business profile
  • Scores each tender by relevance, so you can prioritise or pass fast
  • Surfaces requirements early, no more surprises buried on page 47
  • Saves you hours, by helping you avoid writing bids you were never going to win

You’re not making decisions based on instinct or pressure. You’re making them based on fit.

Tendify doesn’t write your bid. It just tells you whether it’s worth writing in the first place.

Let’s wrap this up.

Every tender you skip makes the next one stronger

Winning more tenders doesn’t start with writing faster, it starts with choosing better.

The best SMEs don’t chase everything. They chase what fits, and they do it with focus. That means saying no early, without guilt, and without second-guessing.

Because every bid you skip clears space for one that actually deserves your time.

If your team is stuck in a cycle of bidding hard and winning rarely, the fix might not be your proposal, it might be your process.

Smarter qualification = higher win rate.

And smarter qualification starts with better visibility and better decisions.

Want to focus on tenders that actually fit?
Tendify helps SMEs filter out noise, score relevance, and spend less time chasing the wrong opportunities.
Join waitlist
Tendify logo
Remportez des marchés publics en toute simplicité grâce à l’IA
© 2025 - Tendify. All rights reserved.
Politique de confidentialité